Disgraceful and dismissive treatment of sex abuse survivors by Xavier College
No consultation with survivor's group.
Stay away from the school.
Thu 21 Apr 2022No consultation with survivor's group.
Stay away from the school.
Xavier College Principal, Willian Doherty, and the Society of Jesus have been talking to
some survivors and their supporters for 3-4 years, but when it comes to Xavier College
actually doing something (a smoke and mirrors something), they are completely ignored.
some survivors and their supporters for 3-4 years, but when it comes to Xavier College
actually doing something (a smoke and mirrors something), they are completely ignored.
St Kilda football club does a similar deal with In Good Faith Foundation.
In Good Faith Foundation have done a similar deal with the St Kilda football club.
Jack Rush QC is on the St Kilda board, formerly a president.
Where did St Kilda get the idea from? From Jack Rush? Is IGFF "ambulance chasing" for clients?
Their statements are a carbon copy of the Xavier charter statements.
"We want to be proactive in providing support wherever practicable,
but we also understand the natural hesitancy which might exist in survivors engaging with the club," Finnis said in a statement.
(because there is no proper person to contact!)
"We hope that by partnering with In Good Faith Foundation we can provide a safe place for survivors to tell their story,
be heard, and connected with practical support and care."
An IGFF statement continued: "We hope that by assisting to acknowledge the wrongs of the past,
those survivors that wish to re-engage with the St Kilda Football Club,
will be able to do so knowing that they can be supported by IGFF's independent team of experienced caseworkers and advocates."
Question:
Has the St Kilda football club also made a donation to IGFF?
This "solution" might become common now the precedent is set.
Its a perfect solution for the corporation because they don't have to address the problems internally, or talk to survivors etc. it is all kept at a safe distance.
♦ www.abc.net.au
The secret "Charter of Cooperation" between Xavier College and In Good Faith Foundation.
This would be a first, for an "institutional abuse recovery" charity to enter into a secret agreement with one of the worst sex abusing schools in Australia.
To allow themselves to be manipulated and used by Xavier College for Xavier College's PR and reputation management strategy is staggering.
Are they blind to what they are doing or is it about the money?

An email was sent to In Good Faith Foundation with a list of questions.
hello Joe,
I have some questions about the Charter of Cooperation with Xavier College I hope you can answer.
1. Can I have a copy of the actual document?
2. What does it do for a Xavier survivor that you don't do for your regular clients?
3. How much money did Xavier College donate to IGFF?
4. Is the government grant money you receive tied to helping clients with the Redress Scheme?
i.e. its not for helping a client not going to the Redress Scheme.
5. Does a client you refer to a psychologist etc. have to pay the psych out of their own pocket?
6. What information about Xavier clients will you supply back to Xavier College?
7. Do you have a privacy statement about client information?
8. "It is our collective hope.... that we can reconnect parts of the Xaverian community that have been separated". How would this be achieved?
9. Would your advocacy include demanding information from the Xavier and Jesuit archives that relate to an alleged offender?
10. Would your advocacy include interviewing living Jesuits and teachers who were at Xavier College at the time of an alleged abuse?
11. Would IGFF support the installation of a Loud Fence at Xavier College?
12. How do you resolve the problem of believing survivors stories when Xavier College denies they were abusers?
1. Can I have a copy of the actual document?
2. What does it do for a Xavier survivor that you don't do for your regular clients?
3. How much money did Xavier College donate to IGFF?
4. Is the government grant money you receive tied to helping clients with the Redress Scheme?
i.e. its not for helping a client not going to the Redress Scheme.
5. Does a client you refer to a psychologist etc. have to pay the psych out of their own pocket?
6. What information about Xavier clients will you supply back to Xavier College?
7. Do you have a privacy statement about client information?
8. "It is our collective hope.... that we can reconnect parts of the Xaverian community that have been separated". How would this be achieved?
9. Would your advocacy include demanding information from the Xavier and Jesuit archives that relate to an alleged offender?
10. Would your advocacy include interviewing living Jesuits and teachers who were at Xavier College at the time of an alleged abuse?
11. Would IGFF support the installation of a Loud Fence at Xavier College?
12. How do you resolve the problem of believing survivors stories when Xavier College denies they were abusers?
CORRECTION I stated there was No reply.
This was wrong, the reply went into my spam/trash by accident.
On August 3, 2021, Joe Stroud said "I will endeavour to provide you with information to the questions, where appropriate in as prompt a fashion as is currently practicable.".
Thanks Joe.
August 10, 2021 Clare Leaney responds

A reply from Clare Leaney saying we are not going to talk to you.
Doing this is one way of avoiding answering important questions.
♦ OFFICIAL_CORRESPONDENCE_20210810.pdf
Under the Copyright Act use of the IGFF logo is permitted under the "Fair Dealing" Exception (reporting the news)
"..refrain from making further misrepresentations or false/inaccurate characterisations in future."
A generalized criticism with no detail exactly like Jesuit Provincial Fr. Quyen Vu SJ's letter of dis-engagement.
Firstly, there is no doubt that IGFF does good work in helping survivors of sex abuse.
BUT.... What we have here is a registered charity receiving $400,000 in govt. grants refusing to be "open, accountable and transparent" (ACNC requirement).
They can't just say we are not answering questions because we don't like you.
Program Requirements for the National Redress Scheme Counselling Service in Victoria
In Good Faith Foundation Ltd. is a National Redress Scheme Service Provider
The expectations and requirements of Victorian service providers who deliver counselling and psychological care (CPC) under the National Redress Scheme for people who have experienced institutional child sexual abuse (the Scheme).
Referral process
To access the National Redress Scheme Counselling Service in Victoria, a Person must first accept an offer of redress under the Scheme.
The Victorian Government has elected to deliver a CPC service directly to Victorians entitled to redress.
Trauma-informed and Person-focused support
Service providers will employ practitioners with necessary qualifications and experience to work with people with complex trauma and a history of childhood abuse.
Counselling and psychological care
The National Redress Scheme Counselling Service in Victoria will offer a therapeutic counselling service and Aboriginal healing service.
People who accept CPC are entitled to a minimum of 20 hours counselling and/or Aboriginal healing.
Additional services, including peer-led support, advocacy, and linking people with external services, will be provided as required.
Conflict of interest
Service providers will have procedures and processes in place to identify, disclose and manage conflicts of interest.
Service providers will be alert to conflicts of interest, actual or perceived, with organisations or individuals responsible for institutional child sexual abuse.
Xavier College has made a substantial donation to the In Good Faith Foundation,
so that IGFF will take on Xavier College survivors.
This is a serious conflict of interest
In Good Faith Foundation Ltd. Registered as charity on 15 August 2014
Financial report 2020.
Total income: $420,053.00
Government grant as a National Redress Scheme service Provider: $404,006.00 (96.18%)
Other income: $16,047.00
Total Expenses $385,153.00
Total Expenses From Employees $307,259.00 (85.79%)
Contacts: Claire Leaney clare@igff.org.au tel: 03 9940 1533
In Good Faith Foundation Ltd. Financial statements.
2014 | Government grants | $52,412.00 |
Donations and bequests: | $16,380.00 | |
2015 | Government grants: | $261,013.00 |
Other revenue/receipts: | $0.00 | |
Total revenue/receipts: | $261,303.00 | |
2016 | Revenue | $231,200 |
Government grant revenue | $109,219 | |
Donation revenue | $102,539 | |
Employee benefits expense | $185,773 | |
2017 | Revenue | $285,181 |
Government grant revenue | $102,136 | |
Donation revenue | $152,699 | |
Government grant revenue | $102,136 | |
2018 | Revenue | $257.521 |
Employee expenses | $219,010 | |
Donation revenue | $134,279 | |
Case work income | $6000 | |
Government grant revenue | $103,326 | |
2019 | Donations and bequests: | $49,086 |
Revenue from government including grants: | $150,660 | |
Revenue from providing goods or services: | $37,000 | |
Total income/receipts | $236,746.00 | |
2020 | Total Revenue | $420,053 |
Government grants (DSS) | $293,988 | |
Government grants (DHHS) | $100,000 | |
Government grants (cash flow boost) | $10,000 | |
Donations | $11,405 |
You can see here that donations rose and fell with the publicity around the Royal Commission.
In 2014 it was $16,380 then to a high point of $152,699 in 2017 then down to $11,405 in 2020.
Keep in mind that the Program Requirements with a National Redress Scheme Counselling Service Govt. grant say it is only to assist survivors who have accepted a Redress Scheme offer of compensation.
There is some confusion here, another service provider said they use the money to assist survivvors to prepare them for a Redress Scheme application.
"Sexually abused students need ongoing, not piecemeal, support"
As if by magic another article in The Age, July 29 2021, with glowing approval of Bill Doherty's outsourcing initiative. This one by a professional public relations person.
How and why did The Age publish this PR release?
That's two glowing articles in a week.
Not one word from a sex abuse survivor who has a different opinion of the "initiative".
This lack of balance in The Age is very concerning.
A letter was sent to The Age editor, Gay Alcorn, explaining our concerns and asking about a right of reply, and there has be no response.
In brief, what Xavier College has actually done is pay In Good Faith Foundation to be a part of their PR push to look wonderful. The magicians trick of misdirection "look over there".
How much money Xavier "donated" to IGFF must be disclosed.
Their annual income is $420,000 so another $100,000 would make a big difference to them.
2020 financial year donations were a mere $11,405
The ONLY thing this "Charter of Cooperation" does is give priority to Xavier abuse survivors.
How could IGFF get tough with Xavier College about providing information for example, when they are effectively working for of Xavier College.
Conflict of interest
National Redress Sccheme Service Providers will have procedures and processes in place to identify, disclose and manage conflicts of interest.
Service providers will be alert to conflicts of interest, actual or perceived, with organisations or individuals responsible for institutional child sexual abuse.
( from Program Requirements for the National Redress Scheme Counselling Service in Victoria )
Xavier College has made a substantial donation to the In Good Faith Foundation,
so that IGFF will take on Xavier College survivors.
This is a serious conflict of interest
This also raises the question did Xavier College make a donation to IGFF at the time of the installation of the memorial rock and plaque on Sunday 22 May 2016.
(Then they went for a cup of tea in sex abuser Eldon Hogan's building.)
And it raises concerns about a survivor's privacy, what is IGFF going to tell Xavier College about the survivors.
Boys' schools must challenge entrenched attitudes
By John Simpson July 29, 2021
♦ www.theage.com.au - Sexually abused students need ongoing, not piecemeal, support
"The school is set to tackle the consequences of past child sexual abuse and to do so in ways that are open, transparent, meaningful and hopefully of lasting support and assistance to survivors. In other words, Xavier wishes to be more “human” in its response strategy and less institutional."
This "human, open, transparent, meaningful" response is to tell you to go somewhere else.
"BP, Shell, BHP and Fortescue Metals Group have all adapted to new and challenging operating environments"
By handling it inside the company not by outsourcing to a third party.
"Xavier has signalled it wants to actively do something rather than bury its past - shocking as it is."
Actively rip down the Loud Fence twice, actively block survivors getting archives information, actively call the police to remove a person, actively accept a sex abuser's money, actively not talk to two survivors about their abuse when Mr. Doherty heard them disclose it, actively try to block historical sex abuse information at a reunion, actively accuse this website of using "dark language" and being inaccurate and untruthful.
"Whether directly or indirectly involved in the shameful scourge of child abuse, all schools should see the wisdom and humanity of Xavier’s efforts and implement their own change in this, the 21st century."
This is an extraordinary statement. Mr. Simpson needs to disclose if he has a personal relationship with Mr. Doherty.
This "wisdom and humanity" is to point survivors to a charity in Brunswick because we don't do it here at the school.
Mr. Simpson knows nothing of what abuse survivors really need.

John Simpson is a member of the Monash University council and a former member of the Scotch College council.
He is a Fellow of the Monash University Centre for Strategy & Governance and, as a trained journalist and broadcaster, is a contributor to The Australian and several online platforms including The Spectator and The Conversation.
Mr John Simpson spent the majority of his career with Shell.
He was Director - External Affairs at Shell. (So he has a great deal of experience in professional public relations.)
His work history shows no contact with or expertise in child sex abuse, unless there was some as a Scotch College council member.
He has been a Director of some 12 organisations including Scotch College, the Melbourne Symphony Orchestra, and the the NGV Foundation (Vic) ( Allan Myers AO QC, a prominent catholic and strong supporter of Geaoge Pell, is a member).
Xavier College washes its hands of helping abuse survivors.
The Age article and analysis
The Age article and analysis

Top private school’s attempt to climb out of the legal trenches and start to heal
July 24, 2021 ♦ www.theage.com.au
By Richard Baker
July 24, 2021 — 5.00am
♦ Read the article here .....
For a few years now, the principal of Melbourne’s Xavier College, William Doherty, has wanted to do something meaningful beyond apologising to students whose lives have been irreparably damaged by sexual abuse perpetrated at the school in the past.
But with the involvement of lawyers, insurers and religious orders desperate to minimise damage and bad publicity, Xavier had, at times, been “stuck in a culture of fear”, Mr Doherty said. This had stopped it connecting with and supporting former students who have suffered.
Now the principal wants that to change and instead to “own” its past. This weekend Mr Doherty will announce to the broader Xavier community – among the best-connected and most influential networks in Melbourne – that they will have access to counselling and support services from the In Good Faith Foundation, an independent support organisation for sexual abuse survivors.
“It is our hope that, by ... working in trust and partnership with an external party and where there is a mutual desire to care for people who have been hurt through abuse, we can best care for those Old Xaverians who may be living with the scars of abuse,” he said.
Some of Melbourne’s most prestigious schools have been paraded through the courts in the past few years and parted with multimillion-dollar payouts after former students have sued for past wrongs. Recent changes to Victorian legislation to remove the statute of limitations in sexual abuse cases and allow previous deeds of release to be set aside if compensation amounts are deemed unfair has given rise to eye-watering compensation and lost-income payments to former students.
In May, lawyer Michael Magazanik, a partner at Rightside Legal, helped a former Wesley College student win what is believed to be a record Victorian payout of $3 million plus costs for his repeated abuse by a teacher and a counsellor in the 1970s. The case was settled on the third day of a Supreme Court trial.
Weeks later, Wesley College had Australian of the Year Grace Tame, a sexual abuse survivor and advocate, address the school’s staff and implored them to listen carefully to their students.
A number of schools, including Geelong Grammar and Trinity Grammar, have accepted responsibility for past failings and established new policies to better protect students. Trinity joined the National Redress Scheme in 2018 and headmaster Phil de Young has also unreservedly apologised to students and parents for the school’s failures. The school last year paid out more than $1 million to a former boarder who was abused in the 1970s.
Geelong Grammar under principal Rebecca Cody’s leadership has formed a recognition committee which includes survivors of abuse to help guide the school’s response to claims and now employs a sexual abuse liaison co-ordinator.
“There definitely is in some schools a clear change in attitude,” Mr Magazanik said. “You can divide them into two categories: there are those continuing legal trench warfare and aggressively fight every case, while others have emerged blinking into the 21st century and recognise that nuclear weapons at 40 paces does them no good.”
Fighting and losing legal cases was “becoming a matter of reputational damage in what is an extremely competitive marketplace [for private schooling],” Mr Magazanik said.
“Some school leaders are accepting that the right thing to do after decades of bullying survivors is to actually practice the values they preach.”
Another plaintiff lawyer, Judy Courtin, said: “I totally commend what is happening at Xavier and other schools. But the problem is the second there is litigation, the gloves are off and it’s a dirty, dirty fight.”
Dr Courtin said religious organisations behind the schools and their insurers still too often re-contested claims of abuse which had already been well established, drew out the legal process to increase costs, threatened to appeal adverse judgements and delayed settlement offers until the eve of a trial or days into during proceedings.
The Victorian Education Department has also been accused of heavy-handed legal tactics in cases involving government schools. This is despite the department being bound by “model litigant” guidelines under which it is meant to pay legitimate claims without litigation or delay.
Many survivors have found the Jesuit religious body behind Xavier, the Society of Jesus In Australia Limited, difficult to deal with.
But Melbourne businessman Richard Jabara, an Old Xaverian who was sexually abused at school and is now an ambassador for the In Good Faith Foundation, said the establishment of a support network would help former students who were yet to tell their stories.
“One of the things about Xavier and a lot of the other private schools is that these are lifelong communities that continue on through families, marriages, business, sports. You feel guilt, shame and isolation about what happened to you and you fear what might happen if you are seen to shit-can your school,” he said.
“So for the school to be saying it is OK to bring this out into the open is something I support 1000 per cent.”
Mr Jabara was the catalyst for a permanent memorial to be placed at Xavier’s senior campus in Kew in 2015 to acknowledge the victims of abuse.
Xavier’s Mr Doherty told The Age that although legal recourse was an entirely appropriate avenue, schools could not control it, and for survivors it was often a difficult and lonely journey.
He wanted to establish a safe place for those who suffered to “unpack and resolve their trauma and pain” without having to be re-traumatised by attending the school premises where their abuse might have occurred.
In Good Faith chief executive Clare Leaney said there was “no wrong door” for any Old Xaverian to walk through to get help. Ms Leaney said as well as getting a sense of justice, many abuse survivors wanted to end their isolation from their school community.
Under the Xavier model, In Good Faith will be available to help young and old Xavier students with mental health support, to navigate the legal system, liaise with police and deal with financial, employment and housing problems.
An accredited provider of services under the federal government’s National Redress Scheme, In Good Faith helps about 600 clients across Australia. It will be available to past and present Xavier students even if they are involved in litigation with the religious order responsible for the school.
Mr Magazanik and Dr Courtin also said it was incumbent on plaintiff lawyers to bring more matters to trial so the courts and the public could properly understand the extent of the damage that has been done.
“We are talking about the only category of injured person that has had to wait decades to be heard in court,” Mr Magazanik said.
Dr Courtin represented former St Kevin’s College student Paris Street in a case that became public in February last year after it emerged the school’s former leadership provided court references to a former sports coach convicted of sexually abusing Mr Street.
The fallout saw the school’s principal, Stephen Russell, and dean of sport, Luke Travers, depart. Earlier this month, Mr Russell’s successor, Deborah Barker, released an independent review of the school’s culture which found misogynistic attitudes and sexist language were still a problem 18 months after the Paris Street case became public and a video recording surfaced of St Kevin’s boys singing a sexist chant on a tram.
Mr Magazanik said some schools with troubling histories of dealing with sexual abuse had recently appointed women to senior leadership positions, such as Ms Barker at St Kevin’s and Rebecca Cody at Geelong Grammar, who has established a recognition committee to help guide the school’s response to abuse cases and employed a survivor liaison co-ordinator.
But with the involvement of lawyers, insurers and religious orders desperate to minimise damage and bad publicity, Xavier had, at times, been “stuck in a culture of fear”, Mr Doherty said. This had stopped it connecting with and supporting former students who have suffered.
Now the principal wants that to change and instead to “own” its past. This weekend Mr Doherty will announce to the broader Xavier community – among the best-connected and most influential networks in Melbourne – that they will have access to counselling and support services from the In Good Faith Foundation, an independent support organisation for sexual abuse survivors.
“It is our hope that, by ... working in trust and partnership with an external party and where there is a mutual desire to care for people who have been hurt through abuse, we can best care for those Old Xaverians who may be living with the scars of abuse,” he said.
Some of Melbourne’s most prestigious schools have been paraded through the courts in the past few years and parted with multimillion-dollar payouts after former students have sued for past wrongs. Recent changes to Victorian legislation to remove the statute of limitations in sexual abuse cases and allow previous deeds of release to be set aside if compensation amounts are deemed unfair has given rise to eye-watering compensation and lost-income payments to former students.
In May, lawyer Michael Magazanik, a partner at Rightside Legal, helped a former Wesley College student win what is believed to be a record Victorian payout of $3 million plus costs for his repeated abuse by a teacher and a counsellor in the 1970s. The case was settled on the third day of a Supreme Court trial.
Weeks later, Wesley College had Australian of the Year Grace Tame, a sexual abuse survivor and advocate, address the school’s staff and implored them to listen carefully to their students.
A number of schools, including Geelong Grammar and Trinity Grammar, have accepted responsibility for past failings and established new policies to better protect students. Trinity joined the National Redress Scheme in 2018 and headmaster Phil de Young has also unreservedly apologised to students and parents for the school’s failures. The school last year paid out more than $1 million to a former boarder who was abused in the 1970s.
Geelong Grammar under principal Rebecca Cody’s leadership has formed a recognition committee which includes survivors of abuse to help guide the school’s response to claims and now employs a sexual abuse liaison co-ordinator.
“There definitely is in some schools a clear change in attitude,” Mr Magazanik said. “You can divide them into two categories: there are those continuing legal trench warfare and aggressively fight every case, while others have emerged blinking into the 21st century and recognise that nuclear weapons at 40 paces does them no good.”
Fighting and losing legal cases was “becoming a matter of reputational damage in what is an extremely competitive marketplace [for private schooling],” Mr Magazanik said.
“Some school leaders are accepting that the right thing to do after decades of bullying survivors is to actually practice the values they preach.”
Another plaintiff lawyer, Judy Courtin, said: “I totally commend what is happening at Xavier and other schools. But the problem is the second there is litigation, the gloves are off and it’s a dirty, dirty fight.”
Dr Courtin said religious organisations behind the schools and their insurers still too often re-contested claims of abuse which had already been well established, drew out the legal process to increase costs, threatened to appeal adverse judgements and delayed settlement offers until the eve of a trial or days into during proceedings.
The Victorian Education Department has also been accused of heavy-handed legal tactics in cases involving government schools. This is despite the department being bound by “model litigant” guidelines under which it is meant to pay legitimate claims without litigation or delay.
Many survivors have found the Jesuit religious body behind Xavier, the Society of Jesus In Australia Limited, difficult to deal with.
But Melbourne businessman Richard Jabara, an Old Xaverian who was sexually abused at school and is now an ambassador for the In Good Faith Foundation, said the establishment of a support network would help former students who were yet to tell their stories.
“One of the things about Xavier and a lot of the other private schools is that these are lifelong communities that continue on through families, marriages, business, sports. You feel guilt, shame and isolation about what happened to you and you fear what might happen if you are seen to shit-can your school,” he said.
“So for the school to be saying it is OK to bring this out into the open is something I support 1000 per cent.”
Mr Jabara was the catalyst for a permanent memorial to be placed at Xavier’s senior campus in Kew in 2015 to acknowledge the victims of abuse.
Xavier’s Mr Doherty told The Age that although legal recourse was an entirely appropriate avenue, schools could not control it, and for survivors it was often a difficult and lonely journey.
He wanted to establish a safe place for those who suffered to “unpack and resolve their trauma and pain” without having to be re-traumatised by attending the school premises where their abuse might have occurred.
In Good Faith chief executive Clare Leaney said there was “no wrong door” for any Old Xaverian to walk through to get help. Ms Leaney said as well as getting a sense of justice, many abuse survivors wanted to end their isolation from their school community.
Under the Xavier model, In Good Faith will be available to help young and old Xavier students with mental health support, to navigate the legal system, liaise with police and deal with financial, employment and housing problems.
An accredited provider of services under the federal government’s National Redress Scheme, In Good Faith helps about 600 clients across Australia. It will be available to past and present Xavier students even if they are involved in litigation with the religious order responsible for the school.
Mr Magazanik and Dr Courtin also said it was incumbent on plaintiff lawyers to bring more matters to trial so the courts and the public could properly understand the extent of the damage that has been done.
“We are talking about the only category of injured person that has had to wait decades to be heard in court,” Mr Magazanik said.
Dr Courtin represented former St Kevin’s College student Paris Street in a case that became public in February last year after it emerged the school’s former leadership provided court references to a former sports coach convicted of sexually abusing Mr Street.
The fallout saw the school’s principal, Stephen Russell, and dean of sport, Luke Travers, depart. Earlier this month, Mr Russell’s successor, Deborah Barker, released an independent review of the school’s culture which found misogynistic attitudes and sexist language were still a problem 18 months after the Paris Street case became public and a video recording surfaced of St Kevin’s boys singing a sexist chant on a tram.
Mr Magazanik said some schools with troubling histories of dealing with sexual abuse had recently appointed women to senior leadership positions, such as Ms Barker at St Kevin’s and Rebecca Cody at Geelong Grammar, who has established a recognition committee to help guide the school’s response to abuse cases and employed a survivor liaison co-ordinator.
Analysis
First thing to note is the misleading headline.
Xavier College has never entered a legal trench, it is not sued, it does not make compensation payments, it does not handle sex abuse complaints.
It is all handled by the Society of Jesus.
The original article said "Xavier College has had a number of sexual abuse cases ..." this was removed I imagine because it is very misleading, there have been a LOT of claims.
"have access to counselling..." This is also very misleading, they will have a case worker give them a psychologist's name to go to.
"eye-watering compensation and lost-income payments to former students."
Dog whistling that survivors don't deserve the compensation amounts.
But with the involvement of lawyers, insurers and religious orders desperate to minimise damage and bad publicity,
Xavier had, at times, been “stuck in a culture of fear”, Mr Doherty said.
This had stopped it connecting with and supporting former students who have suffered.
That is an admission that they have done very little.
Very different to the Rector Fr. Middleton saying that a document I made saying Xavier had done nothing was all lies.
The "erection" of a rock and plaque helps the school but its debateable if it actually helps survivors.
And still Xavier College itself is not connecting with or supporting the survivors.
Its a nonsense that this "culture of fear" has stopped Xavier College doing something.
So what happens now is if you go the school wanting to make a complaint you are told to go to the Society of Jesus, if you go asking for support you are told to go see the In Good Faith people, Xavier College washes it's hands of it all.
Too often, the only recourse for the victim has been a legal journey, and a lonely and difficult one at that.
Another admission that Xavier College does not welcome or assist survivors.
Now the principal wants that to change and instead to “own” its past.
"owning the past" requires a lot more than outsourcing the engagement with survivors to a third party.
There has been a very strong wall built around Xavier College to stop any infiltration of sex abuse history and discussion about it.
This outsourcing initiative continues that policy.
"without having to be re-traumatised by attending the school premises where their abuse might have occurred."
Another excuse to keep anything about sex abuse from entering the school perimeter.
It is difficult to re-visit the place where you were abused but it can also be helpful to stare the devil in the face, this can reduce your fear and lessen the power the place still has over you.
Survivors "will have access to counselling and support services from the In Good Faith Foundation"
They already have that from the In Good Faith Foundation if they want to go there.
The only discernable difference is that they have established a Charter of Cooperation which prioritizes Xavier College abuse survivors.
Note: the In Good Faith Foundation do not do counselling, they are a support and referral service.
You will still have to pay for your psychologist/counselling.
Exactly what Xavier College's money is being used for is not known.
Clare Leaney says " many abuse survivors wanted to end their isolation from their school community."
"Survivors of Institutional Abuse are often ostracised by the very communities where they have the strongest personal connections. This Charter has the potential to be the bridge that reconnects old Xaverians, isolated by historical abuse, to the present-day Xavier community."
Of all the abuse survivors I know, not one of them wants to re-engage with the school community.
But how this thing could reconnect them is a mystery.
The Old Xaverians Association will not go anywhere near a sex abuse survivor.
They have on numerous occasions refused to get involved in helping survivors.
There is nothing nor noone at Xavier College for a survivor to connect with.
"Xavier College has demonstrated over these years of collaboration, an unwavering commitment to redress for crimes of the past, but also a dedication to educate current/future students to avoid the acts if the past from ever occurring again in future.” " Clare Leaney
"commitment to redress" means that Bill Doherty will tell you that there are "channels" and that is to go to the Society of Jesus' Director of Culture, Risk and Professional Standards.
"educate current/future students" means that you call the police to remove a man handing out Eldon Hogan information from the footpath outside xavier College.
And means that you try to prevent sex abuse information being made available at a 50 year reunion.
And means that you rip down a Loud Fence twice even though you promised it would remain.
A Xavier College teacher said recently:
"I did ask about the ribbons, but no one would talk. The culture of fear amongst staff is high and only the super ambitious are ‘in’ and they are ruthless. "
Background to the initiative
Mr. Doherty has said to me that things I have said over the past few years and in conversations with him,
that it made him think they should do something more.At the Old Xaverians anuual general meeting I invited myself to attend and spoke about the school and the Old Xaverians doing nothing to help survivors.
The President Dr. Chris Worsnop said that he and the school had been talking about doing something.
I said it was crucial that a survivor be included in these talks, and they agreed it was a good idea but as far as I know it was never done.
What they have come up with is the outsourcing described above.
And the Old Xaverians Association has again retreated from getting involved.
Contrast this with Geelong Grammar School who have appointed a Survivor Liaison Coordinator and an Independent Counsellor.
The missing bits - What survivors really need from the school
1. Access to and provision of information from the school and the Jesuit archives.
This includes dates and locations for the alleged offender.
Any notes about the alleged offender's behaviour, why he was moved or dismissed, any action taken to reprimand him etc.
As it is at the moment.
A survivor will not be given any information that is not his personal information, that information is supplied to conform with privacy law.
From a school which is truly sorry and truly remorseful and truly wants to help the survivors, and understands these were crimes that should not be covered up, you would expect they would say "we will investigate this person you accuse very thoroughly and give to you all the information we find in all the archives and make inquiries with people and students who knew/know him, because if there criminals and crimes committed in our school we want to know about them".
2. The school to commission a thorough legal/academic study of the history of sex abuse at Xavier College by an independant expert.
This can be paid for by the Eldon Hogan Trust monies.
Since the Trust has financed many publications lauding Xavier College why not have sex abuser Eldon Hogan's money used for a proper purpose.
3. Humbly accept criticism and public demonstration of support for survivors.
A Loud Fence was installed twice at Xavier College, both times it was ripped down, even though Mr. Doherty promised it would remain.
Mr. Doherty has said to me:
"your commentary regularly lacks truth and is unfairly and unjustifiably misleading. It is most unfortunate that this is the case and severely limits our ability to interact with you and achieve any positive outcome."
Be it for legal reasons or fear of getting involved with actual facts and events Mr. Doherty's and the Society of Jesus criticisms of this website are always wide generalizations, they will not discuss details or offer their corrections which I have often invited them to do.
"assertions you are making about the College, my staff and our approach which are simply not correct and are being expressed without validation."
Tell me what they are and we can get it right.
Both Mr. Doherty and the Society of Jesus try to exercise their perceived power and say that if only you would be reasonable then we will talk to you.
It always has to be on their terms. As at school, we will punish you if you don't behave.
4. Honestly answer important questions.
e.g. (a) How does the school justify accepting money from sex abuser Eldon Hogan's trust? The school and the Board have been asked and won't answer the question.
(b) Under what legal provision does the school provide private personal sensitive student information to the Society of Jesus?
Mr. Doherty won't answer the question, only to say he is comfortable with what they do.
(c) Name the offenders.
Since the Society of Jesus won't do it, the school should publish a list of credibly accused sex offenders.
This would be a sincere mea culpa.
There are many reasons they won't do this and all are about protecting the school's reputation and real concern for the survivors comes a bad last.
The Sounds of Silence

Emails were sent to the Editor Gay Alcorn
and the Opinion Editor Margaret Easterbrook
with concerns about balance.
No reply.

and the Opinion Editor Margaret Easterbrook

with concerns about balance.
No reply.
Off topic slightly, August 2, 2021, The age Opinion section runs "Reciting the Lord’s Prayer important" by Dr Kevin Donnelly is a senior research fellow at the Australian Catholic University. ♦ www.theage.com.au
An illogical piece of christian/catholic promotion.
August 4, 2021 Another catholic centric Opinion piece. ♦ Lapsed Catholics need to reflect their beliefs in the census
August 17, 2021. Another pro Christian opinion piece.
Religious belief deserves protection
♦ www.theage.com.au
Accountability
Effectively Xavier College and the Society of Jesus are not accountable to anyone except themselves. A serious case of bullying and physical assault at Xavier College was reported to the VRQA and MACS and nothing was done.
Principal Bill Doherty invited the victim to leave the school.
Principal Bill Doherty invited the victim to leave the school.
The bodies who are supposed to be involved in oversight are all disinterested paper tigers.
They include the Victorian Registrations & Qualifications Authority (VRQA), Melbourne Archdiocese Catholic Schools (MACS), the Victorian Department of Education, the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission (ACNC).
As of July 2021 the VRQA is responsible for auditing/regulating Victorian boarding schools.
If you were to report to any of these bodies that Xavier College was not abiding by one of it's own stated policies (e.g. the Complaints Handling Policy, Child Protection etc.), nothing will happen.
VRQA definition:
Child abuse includes any act committed against a child involving:
a sexual offence
a grooming offence; or
the infliction on a child of physical violence, serious emotional or psychological harm or serious neglect.
♦ more... Accountability
Letter from Xavier College
♦ College_Letter_to_OX_re_XC_and_IGFF_Charter
"Xavier College has established a Charter of Cooperation with the In Good Faith Foundation"
" Xavier has been working closely with the Society of Jesus in these arrangements"
This would be the biggest roadblock to doing something meaningful. The whole of Xavier College's response to historical sex abuse has been dictated by the Society of Jesus.
" We can never shy away from the simple truth of what is right is right, and what is wrong is wrong.
That people suffered abuse is wrong. That we should stand with them and their care is right."
Mr. Doherty, the Rector Fr. Chris Muddleton SJ and Board Chair Tony Nunan are standing in Kew the survivors are given a map to go stand in Brunswick.
A nice comfortable distance.
" May we continue to find further ways of embracing our fellow Xaverians, better ways of achieving fulfilment in Christ, ongoing ways of being men and women for and with others."
Okay, here's a suggestion.
Let's have a Survivors Day at Xavier College. All staff, students and parents are invited.
Have a few talks and seminars and guest speakers.
AND
Have a Survivors Support marquis at the Maytime Fair.
How about stop ripping down the Loud Fence?

"Those who have suffered abuse and trauma through past experiences need a safe place to tell their story."
Xavier College must not be a safe place to tell their stories.


Contrast with Scotch College
There are some things Scotch College has done that are a proper response.
Mon 25 May 2015
Scotch College says it settled five claims, mostly related to sexual abuse dating back to the 1960s.
The school is attempting to contact others who may have been victims through a letter sent to thousands of former students.
Xavier College has been asked to actively seek out the victims of sex abuse and has refused.
The school is attempting to contact others who may have been victims through a letter sent to thousands of former students.
“OSCA [Old Scotch Collegians Association] and the school take matters most seriously,
seeking both to support Old Boys and assist them to contact appropriate agencies and authorities.”
Xavier College and the Old Xaverians Association refuse to engage with survivors and send them to IGFF.
The school principal, Tom Batty, also sent a letter to parents of current students informing them about the historical incidents.
♦ www.theguardian.com Xavier College, nor Riverview, has never informed parents of any incidents or names of offenders.
In fact they try to keep it a secret.
Riverview Principal did write to parents about two offenders facing court, calling the "two men" and saying a little as possible.
They are Fr. Theo Overberg SJ and Fr. Lawrence Leonard SJ, both high profile Jesuits.
But going back in time a bit Scotch did not respond well and the Achurch case has strong similarities to Xavier's Eldon Hogan.
June 8, 2015
Abuse survivor Matthew Stuart says the top Melbourne school presided over a painful history of denial and omissions, including naming an award after the perpetrator
Michael Achurch, his house master and a respected geography teacher, standing beside his bed.
His teacher was indecently assaulting him.
Mr Stuart reported the sexual abuse to then principal Philip Roff, who removed Mr Achurch as house master, despite opposition from senior members of the school community.
He wasn't offered counselling over what happened either.
Mr Achurch crashed his car into a pole and died.
His popular teacher's sudden death, however, propelled him into a revered status.
one of the school's magazines ran a glowing three-page tribute.
the Michael Achurch Award was still being given out to boys who competed in Scotch College's 24 Hour Hike.
Recipients were never told of the sexual abuse cases.
The school's 2001 history book, A Deepening Roar, then downplayed the abuse and questioned, again, if he was lying about it.
♦ www.theage.com.au
♦ Name of Scotch College teacher accused of child molestation used to support youth education
Michael Achurch, his house master and a respected geography teacher, standing beside his bed.
His teacher was indecently assaulting him.
Mr Stuart reported the sexual abuse to then principal Philip Roff, who removed Mr Achurch as house master, despite opposition from senior members of the school community.
He wasn't offered counselling over what happened either.
Mr Achurch crashed his car into a pole and died.
His popular teacher's sudden death, however, propelled him into a revered status.
one of the school's magazines ran a glowing three-page tribute.
the Michael Achurch Award was still being given out to boys who competed in Scotch College's 24 Hour Hike.
Recipients were never told of the sexual abuse cases.
The school's 2001 history book, A Deepening Roar, then downplayed the abuse and questioned, again, if he was lying about it.
♦ www.theage.com.au
♦ Name of Scotch College teacher accused of child molestation used to support youth education
Xavier College has prizes with Eldon Hogan's name, a boat, a building, published books, all financed by Eldon Hogan's Trust money.
Irish Jesuits admit failure on abuser fuelled trauma
August 12, 2021 Belvedere College, a private Jesuit Secondary School for Boys which James Joyce attended from 1893-1898.
The head of the Jesuits in Ireland has said the order must take full responsibility for the wrongdoing of Fr Joseph Marmion,
whom a number of former students say sexually, physically and psychologically abused them in the 1970s when he taught at Belvedere College in Dublin.
In a 50-page report, Joseph Marmion – The Jesuit Response, Fr Leonard Moloney SJ says that
while Marmion’s actions inflicted severe trauma on individual pupils, this was “magnified by
the failure of the Jesuits to recognise the danger he posed to schoolboys in our care and in later ministries or to understand and respond to your needs as his victims”.
He said that the Jesuits did not grasp the destructive effects of his abuse.
More than 40 people who had not previously shared their stories about Marmion with the Jesuits’ safeguarding office
did so in the wake of a Jesuit statement in March this year.
(This undelines the crucial importance of the institution itself admitting and investigating the truth.
But is also a reason why they won't do it)
♦ more.... www.thetablet.co.uk

forever on the edge of falling